Talk:.264 Winchester Magnum
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Dead link
[edit]During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.chuckhawks.com/subscribers/rifle_cartridge_page/264mag.htm
- In .264 Winchester Magnum on 2011-05-20 21:36:09, 401 Authorization Required
- In .264 Winchester Magnum on 2011-05-31 04:50:22, 401 Authorization Required
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:50, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Dead link 2
[edit]During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/PerCaliber2Guide/Rifle/Standarddata(Rifle)/264Cal(6.5mm)/264%20Winchester%20Magnum%20pages%20233%20and%20234.pdf
- In .264 Winchester Magnum on 2011-05-20 21:36:09, 404 Not Found
- In .264 Winchester Magnum on 2011-05-31 04:50:55, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 04:51, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Advertisement??
[edit]Under 'Performance', is this a commercial for Double Tap Ammo??? Plus Double Tap states velocities that they never meet by actual Chronographs. Msjayhawk (talk) 01:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on .264 Winchester Magnum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928011833/http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/PerCaliber2Guide/Rifle/Standarddata(Rifle)/264Cal(6.5mm)/264%20Winchester%20Magnum%20pages%20233%20and%20234.pdf to http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/PerCaliber2Guide/Rifle/Standarddata(Rifle)/264Cal(6.5mm)/264%20Winchester%20Magnum%20pages%20233%20and%20234.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)